Casio – and why I like them.

Casio as a brand seem to have been in existence for almost as long as I have – well almost! -)

And it makes you wonder why?

They started in 1946 in Japan and still producing today and providing the world with more innovative products. With many tech milestones back from the early days of Calculators, Musical Keyboards, E Dictionaries, to what I’m interested in right now – watches. From G-Shock (1983), RC controlled models, to GPS to whatever . . . . the range is amazing and ongoing.

Proof of how good they are can be seen in their present line up of mechanical and Digital watches – because, so many of them don’t seem to have changed, since they were first produced – There’s no doubt they were and are well designed and do the job they are meant to do, right from the start.

Casio at it’s best. Affordable, Quartz accuracy and lots of functions.

And their pricing for a decent watch that will last and last, is amazingly cheap in comparison to so many competitors.

This is the ubiquitous Casio AE-1000W-1A2VEF – some title I know, but this model has been around for many years and is still a remarkable best seller.

Very affordable and for reliability and features, it’s as good as they get. It’s also very clear to read and at a glance shows the time with running seconds, am or pm, the Day, Month and Year, even your time zone.

The controls are obvious on the top of the watch bezel – Adjust, Mode, Search and Light. It also has a 10 year battery life, which rather makes these so called “smart” watches a bit of a joke, in my opinion.

The functions and features list is comprehensive –

Accuracy is +/- 30 seconds a month, An Alarm Function with 5 Daily Alarms: Each will sound every day at the time you set, an Hourly time signal: The watch beeps every hour on the hour (selectable on/off).
It also has an Auto Calendar – Once set, the automatic calendar always displays the correct date. It also has a Countdown Timer, from 24 hours, measuring 1/10 second. A Stopwatch function, which can measure 24 hours with different modes – Elapsed time, 1st-2nd place times and all to 1/100th second.

Plus, if that wasn’t enough, it features a World Time – giving you 4 Time Zones (quite enough) and these Local Times can be called up quickly and easily, which is so much better than some over-complicated World Time models.

As said, the dial displays current Day, Week and Year, so a quick glance is all you need on a daily basis and this is all contained in a very tough resin case measuring just 43.7mm diameter and 13.7mm depth. The strap is resin, which has never been my favourite, as they tend to go brittle, but this can be changed quite easily.

The dial can also be illuminated with LED and an afterglow function. There is a Mute Function which switches OFF any tone sounds, whilst all pre-set Alarms or Timer functions stay active.

The glass is also break resistant and the control pushers are shrouded, just enough to prevent accidental operation – Note– the dial light button is top right and very easy to operate. The watch is also Water Resistant to 100m, so as a “daily” why take it off at all?

At around £40 in the UK and changed little since first introduced, there’s a reason – it’s simply because they got this one just right, first time. So, if in the market for an easy to use, easy to see, easy to live with digital quartz – and when you consider the two similar models noted on the links below, I’d say they pretty much got them right!

And that’s why I like Casio (and Timex digital if I’m honest)

Two other models I also own are virtually the same – check them out!
The first – is the Casio AE1200WH-1AV – which I Posted here – https://watchspace.co.uk/2013/11/18/holiday-watch/
Probably the same module, without the “Shock” name, but just as tough – again this is a favourite holiday or travel watch. Note when I bought this, it was under £20!

The Second – a different brand – this is my Timex Expedition T49976 which is very similar, even the dial layout, but without the World Time. This is another favourite travel watch. And for Time Zones – it’s no real problem, as changing time on the Timex is a case of pushing 2 buttons – and it’s done.
This was one of three Posts on this model – https://watchspace.co.uk/2014/08/27/my-camouflage-choice/

Kienzle update (and disappointing)

(Original Post link) – www.watchspace.co.uk/2021/06/14/double-date/

Update – December 2023

The battery has died, which should have been easy to replace – BUT – on trying to remove what appears to be a screw down back – it simply will not move.
One issue is that the slots around the edge of the back plate are VERY badly defined and too shallow for any of my three different tools, after many attempts, to grip properly. I thought for one moment that perhaps these were false slots and the back was a snap type, though the watch is inscribed with 100m Water Resistance, so I thought not. However, I tried the tools I have for snap back – but not possible.

Finally after deciding, that damage or no damage to the back, I was going to get this thing off. So, clamped in the vice (NOT a watch makers one, but a fully fledged industrial one) a decent weight hammer and an effective chisel blade that manage to get wedged in one of these shallow slots, I belted it many, many times!

But . . . . you’ve guessed it – not an iota of difference – no movement whatsoever!

So, as my blood pressure was moving faster than the stupid watch back, I decided enough was enough – I have therefore “thrown” this Kienzle into my junk bin. The rubbish collection people are due later this week – and I am VERY tempted to let it go with them. And that is the very first time since I started watch collecting (many years ago now) that such a thing has happened, but these days, at my age I simply do not have the TIME to mess about.

Memories of Military watches?

One of the most often abused terms is “military” when applied to watches and caused mostly by the fact that watch technology has moved on since the first idea of a Military Specification model appeared. The concept had many facets, each of which was ticked off as a preferred requirement. Indeed it covered such aspects as case materials, what and why used – such as non-shiny and have fitness properties in respect of weather and wear and in situations rarely encountered in civilian life.

Water, mud, night use and physical damage. Although it had to be rugged it also had to be reliable and a good time keeper. Dark dial with white or green luminous numerals which were of legible size, often a 24 hour track and the watches must be if not minimalistic, simple to operate. Battery powered models should have a quick and easy way to replace the battery, hence the battery “hatch” found on many Mil Spec models (though in truth some hatches are anything but easy to get the battery out, once in) Bracelets or straps have to be tough and not fall off easily and both the case and the strap must be waterproof and abrasion resistant.

MWC W10 military - Tritium. A simple interpretation of Mil Spec. — MWC W10 military – Tritium lights. A Mil Spec classic.

And these are just the basics, but as I say watch technology has moved on and so too has the “basic” requirements of a military specified model today. That said some of the best models around are still based on the old specification, as the basic warfare situation, certainly for ground soldiers has hardly changed. In fact many of the older models are collectors gold depending on the Brand and particular Mil Spec at the time.

Uzi Tritium on Quick strap. Another simple Mil Spec interpretation. — Uzi Tritium on Quick strap.
Another Mil Spec interpretation with tritium.

But today “military” as a description of modern watches is perhaps more a fashion statement than a serious and proper “fit for purpose” requirement and there are literally dozens of military “style” models around, from good to bad and from expensive, to cheap as chips. Interestingly a really decent “genuine” military model doesn’t have to cost the earth as long as it gets the basics right.

With the decrease in luminous analog models today unless buying a true Mil Spec model, the “military style” watches, often digital or combo watches tend to feature LE back light displays or dials models. As one of the original requirements of case design is to be non-shiny, to me the idea of any back lights at night, could well be an enemy sniper’s delight and the last thing you saw!

There are few models around that feature a cover, so if checking your watch it would make sense to exercise extreme caution and only expose the dial briefly with the hand shrouding it from being visible by others? – care would certainly be my watchword! But of course I digress – as I’m really talking about Military “style” watches now.

Whilst there is still a market for true Mil Spec models it’s the fashion market that rules today’s biggest market what I’ll call “M-style” watches and basically for those of us who want that military look or style or “stealth” or “macho” model.
Because we collect them and have lots of fun wearing them and because they look good on that camping trip or whatever. Indeed there are so many, that often original concepts are not considered.

In fact some are so “stealthy” that they are virtually impossible to read and forgetting the most basic tenet of all – you must be able to see it to read it – and this for any watch!

Here, I must note that many digital watches, both combo and digital can and often do suffer from lack of clarity, unless they have a very good digital display. Fortunately we have the likes of Casio who’s displays are probably the best available (certainly the positive displays) though there are others, whilst they look great on enhanced photos on web sites, are in reality pretty awful and frankly not worth the money.

The Casio on the other hand is used by so many military folks whether Mil Spec or not, is one the the success stories of watch models today. Some of the G-Shock series in all practical aspects meet and surpass most military requirements AND manage to meet the fashion of the day too. Quite a feat. Mind you, talk to a few forces people and their individual ideas of a “military” model that suits their requirements are often very different. What suits you maybe doesn’t suit me – and so on.

The Casio GD120CM5 digital Camouflage model shown here is one with an excellent display, tough case, dull finish, shock resistant, water resistant to 200m and has a whole pile of extra functions from chronograph to Alarms and OK it does have a decent LED back light – so you MUST take care when using that! So, as far as a digital only model at $130 it’s also pretty good and the camouflage case and strap is a nice touch. Also uses the CR2015 battery so expect around 7 years. But that strap – is it changeable for a standard fit strap? Unfortunately not, as it uses a proprietary resin affair from Casio fitted to 16mm? spring bars – very odd set up – and that’s a pity – but for the price of the watch – maybe buy 3 of ’em – should last a few years, even in action.

However, for me maybe a good combo model with digital AND analog hands (luminous, might be a more sensible option).
Now OK I know that analog hands could be susceptible to shock situations (though never in all my years, including military) but the advantage for me of the “quick glance” at analog hands is something that digital displays simply cannot match. And in a war situation, believe me, you don’t have much time!

Personally and this is just me talking, there are one or two essential requirements.

1 – it must be legible, day and night – so a good back light display and/or luminous hands, plus a gloved had as a shroud – for sniper safety.
2 – it must be Water Resistant to at least 100m, preferably more, as wading in a river with currents is NOT the same as walking in the rain.
3 – preferably non-shiny and with a standard strap fitting or at least screw-in strap bars.
4 – it must be intuitive/easy to operate. In other words I have no interest in carrying a watch manual with me wherever I go.
5 – Quartz is fine and as accurate as you will need. And functions IF useful – if not, stick to basics.

Now if some of these basic requirements seem familiar it’s not surprising is it and does show how sensible the basic Mil Spec ideas were after all!

Casio GW2500BD-A - OK but no cigar! — Casio GW2500BD-A – OK but no cigar!

So what have I found so far?
The Casio BD2500BD-1A shown here is not bad at all, as they use real hands, solid and luminous plus used 2 x displays. But two issues here – 1) they’ve tried to illuminate the entire dial with a dial light – not a good idea and too bright – Why not a simple back light?. The luminous hands will look after themselves. And 2) an integral strap resin affair – if it breaks you’re done!
And amazingly, this model still has shiny old style pushers – surely non-reflective would be better.

It’s also maybe too well specified regarding features – when I was pushing mud in full kit, there’s maybe too much data on my wrist – so perhaps simple is better.
One thing this has shown me is that to find a suitable combo model is maybe NOT as simple as you might think.

Going back to the Casio Camouflage model model above – you would think that all you have to do is add a couple of analog hands and hey presto as if by magic – you’re done. Well think again, because just adding hands is not that easy. Hands generally means the display would be smaller and an hour track also takes up more dial space. You also might have to make the hands skeletal so you don’t hide the digital display, which in turn decreases luminous quality. In short designing a model that has a truly legible analog AND digital dial is quite tricky and you can end up (and often the case actually) with dial some ludicrous dial clutter and no luminosity. Try to light it all and it rarely works well – even for Casio. Better to keep it simple – lume the hands and markers well and only light the digital display is my advice.

St Moritz Momentum Format 4 - not much tougher than this guy! — St Moritz Momentum Format 4 – not much tougher than this guy!

What about Dive watches? and here I already have one that just about meets the requirement –

The St Moritz Momentum Format 4 Whilst not totally dull finish it does at least have a good matte satin finish and it’s debatable if it reflected easily in a torch beam for example, but it’s the nearest yet to my specification. Dial wise it has large and very luminous analog hands with center seconds, great luminous numerals and markers AND 2 x digital displays, both of which are clearly visible in daylight and have excellent back lit illumination in the dark. It also has a 24hr track.
Add to that a pretty decent function set with some scroll too, World Time, Alarm, Chronograph and a Timer it’s well specified.
It takes a standard fitting and interchangeable strap and a 200m Water Resistance with screw down Crown and back. It’s also a neat size at just 42mm across and a more robust steel case you will rarely meet and it has a VERY thick crystal. So not sold as “military” but does a pretty good job fooling me!

Timex T49967 Expedition Alarm Chronograph

I also checked out Timex as they do have a very cheap and affordable and very lightweight combo Expedition model with analog hands and a digital display and the hands are luminous. However, the hands as are shortened and the luminous quality is disappointing for Timex. Solid full length hands would have been so much better and why they’re part skeleton is a complete mystery to me, as the solid part left still sweeps across the digital display anyway.
So maybe a cheap attempt, but they managed to get some of it right – with its non shiny resin, standard strap, decent size with digital function set with Chronograph and Alarms etc, though I can do without the lap and split time stuff buttons on the front as I can’t ever see me using these, unless inadvertently. It also has the “Indiglo” back light system which I’ve always thought an idea that should be good, but rarely is. But the poor lume is a real issue. So, good try, but not there yet.

I also checked out the Casio GA100-1A series of Combo military models and discounted them for 2 reasons. First the luminous analog was confined to the hour markers but NOT the hands which I find surreal. And 2nd the overall dial light is torch like and not my idea of sensible illumination at all. It is also a very large watch which does nothing for me – so not a contender.

The problem with this topic is it’s almost unending, as there are so many watch models out there that meet only certain aspects of the “military” ideal and that ideal spec’ changes depending on who you’re talking to. So the only answer is to decide what you want from a watch, decide what you want to do with that watch, decide on a price range, get it and see if it works for you.

If not, then like me you’re off again on that never ending trawl to find that “ideal” watch – of course you’re never actually going to find it, because there’s always another one just round the corner. OK you might one today that seems to fit your ideal, wear it for a while and yet? what was that watch I saw the other day – wow! it looked awesome! Oh boy . . . .!

Lastly – and after all that’s been said – I managed a post regarding the watch I actually used and was with me in my silly years, back in my military days and you’d be surprised. It wasn’t a Military spec or Diver or Stealth or Tough or Tactical – absolutely not. One of the reasons I suppose being that such terms back then didn’t even exist.

My watch (I only had one) was a gold plated manual dress watch, fortunately with luminous (radium) analog hands and no seconds hand, but with a date window and on a standard leather strap and it survived the worst (arguably the best) years of my life.

And as with things in general, well into my civilian life, it eventually disappeared, but it we had both survived. And it does illustrate that you don’t really need all those fancy descriptive models hyping their so-called military connections. Suddenly you’re in the Forces with whatever watch you had at the time. Then before you know it – you’re in action somewhere and funnily enough time isn’t a commodity you have much of in these situations and you and your watch just get on as best you can.

I have to say we both experienced a few bullet scars, but well – that’s life!

The trouble with triples

The trouble with triples.

By triples, I mean the Day, Date and Month complication watches and the trouble refers to actually being able to clearly see the three indications. Often these are small and in some instances, very small, which is a real pity as conversely the Time is easily read. And example of clarity difficulties would be this first example – The Davis –

A Davis 1730MB model with triple calendar function - but tricky to read. — A Davis 1730MB model with triple calendar – but Day and Month are just too small.

In my opinion this is a case of the promotion outweighing the presentation and somewhat ironic.

So I’m on the lookout for a triple complication “analog” model that properly and clearly can show the three sets of data and at reasonable cost. And not as easy as you might think! As can be seen in the first example of a low to medium priced model the Davis 1730MB quartz analog, the Day and Month windows are so small that reading the data is tricky to say the least. Conversely, the Date indicator on the outer dial index with it’s centre hand pointer and red capture cup is actually good.

Another example is actually from my own collection, the Dugena Calendar model where tiny windows are an issue.

On the wrist that Dugena Calendar info is just too small — On the wrist that Dugena Calendar info again is just too small

Nice watch, good Ronda Swiss quartz movement, but those Day and Month apertures are just too small for comfort, which is a real shame. And there are many others with the same issues, which is a really annoying feature, as the whole point of the model as alluded to by their respective descriptions, is that these are Day, Date and Month complication/indicator watches, but in reality a complication too far – you can’t easily read the darned things. Surely a contradiction in promotion over presentation.

I suppose the common denominator of these models is to be found in the price range. It seems that low to medium price models just don’t manage to produce the clarity required, and yet the more expensive ones often do.

F.P. Journe Quantieme Perpetuel Watch - Wow! — F.P. Journe Quantieme Perpetuel Watch – definitely better in the clarity stakes.

Like this one – The F.P. Journe Perpetuel manages this feat quite easily. Good size apertures, clear printing and a total delight to see all the data simultaneously, but certainly at a cost? and more than I am willing to pay.

But it does show it can be done and we’re simply talking about “indications” here, not too much about complication of movement mechanics, though this does have a bearing, so one would think it surely should be possible at a sensible cost.

Triple Calendar - no problem for Patek Philippe! — Patek Triple Calendar – about as good as you’ll get!

Then there’s the Patek Philippe model, which obviously has a much more complicated set of wheels inside, so perhaps this has merit as to expense, but goodness isn’t it good. Such clarity and possibly one of the very best.

So, my search continues amongst the many thousands of low to medium priced mechanical models that abound today (not including ana/digi types).

I also repeat when I say, today, as there were quite a few Calendar watches in what you would call “vintage” that are actually better then most modern offerings.

But as to modern affordable, this seems to be a rare item indeed, but that’s what I’m looking for and it is not that easy to find.

My search continues.

Casio, Breitling and Briston?

After all the watches I’ve owned, used and worn, my ultimate choices come down to what I like to wear and whether the watch will manage what I want – it’s as simple as that. And price, believe it or not, has very little to do with it.

Two models are always alternatively on my wrist – my 1999 Breitling Aerospace Titanium and my old Timex Expedition shock job.

Chalk and cheese I hear you say, but in reality and for me, they both provide a similar functionality. Both display what I want to see, at a glance – Time, Day and Date and the Timex adds in the Month, which is fine too – though as old as I am, I still tend to know which month it is – but maybe I’m future proofing? 😉
Both watches have many hidden functions, which can be used if you really want to, though in all honesty, hardly ever these days – but nice to have.

However, and the reason for this Post was prompted the other day when I decided to look up what Briston were doing today. This is the French Brand I first encountered back in 2014, when I bought one of their acetate bodied watches that just seemed right for me at the time.
And looking at their current range – which has expanded somewhat, I’m really pleased to see their original concept is alive and kicking, as that’s what initially got my interest in the Brand.

So, it was this new, but very familiar dial layout design of their new Streamliner Adventure model that got my attention And I thought, a little reminiscent of my Aerospace. An Ana/Digi or analogue and digital, but with that definite classic Briston look, which still features the wonderful Italian Acetate case design, which back then was what prompted me to buy one of their classic non-chrono models.

This multi-function model, though, displays more or less what I have on my two beaters – the Time, Day and Date – at a glance. The rest of the functions, as the Breitling are there, if and when you need them. The Briston, unlike the Aerospace has more than just a crown to adjust, it has the more classic 4 button arrangement – which is no bad thing (the Aerospace has a single crown control which does everything – clever but complicated).

So, this Briston has the look I like and not to forget my Timex – it has that expedition look – that rugged and adventure look. So my interest piqued, I decided to check the Streamliner out – and who knows? – a possible amalgam of my two favourite watches?

The fact it comes with a velcro wrap strap is a good point too. A bit like the NATO, but more modern I suppose and not the first I have in my collection. I have a few Timex watches with this concept. The Briston case is fairly chunky and this strap, just like the NATO, really fits a watch to the wrist and holds it firmly in place, like no other. It’s also pretty well fool proof in the water stakes too, as is the watch with it’s 100m Water resistance rating.

I also like the fact that this watch looks – well – just that bit different, though with all this good vibes about it, there is one slight snag.

Did I say that if you like a watch – price has little to do with it?

Well, lets be honest – it’s ALWAYS a consideration – and this Briston is a case in point – in comparison to a classic dive watch for example (and there are many) – It really is relatively expensive at over £300 – and – perhaps just too much – but nice!

Swatch watch

After having been asked about a Swatch watch a friend bought the other day, I thought I’d have a look at what is currently on offer from Swatch this week. I used to check them every so often, but what with the problems over the past year, I missed out managing it.

I should add here that my views haven’t changed much over the years regarding what Swatch is all about, and the quick look-see at my friends new Sistem51 watch, confirmed my opinion. Because, checking over the watches around, it more or less cements my thinking, that at the end of the day the Swatch philosophy of “Second Watch” is still absolutely what they are all about, despite some of their latest ideas.

The original idea of simplification of manufacture, product and cost and using the cheap medium of quartz power, coupled with snazzy “modern” and often just printed dial interpretations, caught the public’s imagination and managed to appeal to those who wanted a cheap throwaway second watch, but one that could also show off their persona – and still their main attraction.

Their foray into automatic mechanical watches and associated hype, for me, is a departure from their core – I mean a cheap quartz powered second watch, ie: the classic Swatch watch as the ultimate disposable throwaway, with its cheap prices is one thing and a great idea, but a mechanical automatic at around the £200 mark – as a throwaway? I really don’t think so.

So, the models I’ve highlighted here are classic Swatch, practical, affordable and the real Swatch deal to me – snappy design dials, cheap quartz movements allowing all sorts of permutations and looks, sizes, colours and styles and is obviously still the way to go – they sell!

The models I’ve chosen because of their ‘look’ plus their practicality – in that these have my preferred Day & Date indications, for I reckon that’s what’s actually useful – personal choice I know, but it is handy and so practical to know the Time, the Day and the Date, with a quick glance. And of course, these are all cheap – and affordable is a bonus.

The black mirror dial Ligne De Fuite, Quartz

The first one is the GAET Highlands Mix with it’s easy read good contrast Day Date, centre seconds hand with its highly coloured two layer silicon strap, black dial. Plastic cased model 41mm diameter and with just 9.85mm case depth. Quartz powered. 30m Water Resistance and around £60-£70.

The second one is the striking coloured Blue Blend bio-sourced model Day & Date watch. The bio-sourced case, strap and clasp – dimensions of 41mm diameter and 9.85mm depth ideal, a printed metal dial, 30m Water Resistance, again at somewhere around £65.

The third choice is the Ligne De Fuite (line of force) model with it’s mirror black effect dial in a matte white plastic case, gives decent definition, so very readable. White/Orange stiped lines silicon strap, Quartz powered, 30m Water Resistance again. Dimensions 41mm diameter and 9.85 depth.

In fact, all of these have the same sensible dimensions and ideal for almost any wrist. All have the standard Swatch battery hatch on the back, accessed so simply by a simple quarter turn with a small coin and the battery pops out to easily replace, so no special tools needed.

Anyway, that’s my current selection of the more Classic Swatch watches that for me, are the real attraction of what Swatch is, or should be all about. They are affordable, colourful and come with lots of variety. Every day watches that don’t break the bank and that so bizarrely and successfully can reflect whatever the wearer wants their persona to reflect. And when you think about it, there’s not many watches can manage that trick.

But I’ve probably already got my favourite Swatch watch – the Irony Green Wink – I know – silly name – But I Posted it way back whenever – I link it HERE

Swatch SISTEM51 for me?

A young friend asked me the other day what I thought of his new Swatch SISTEM51 Automatic watch, which he was wearing on his wrist when we met. Swatch of course is about as well known as Coca-Cola and I’m sure I own a couple myself, though not SISTEM51 automatic models.

Swatch Sistem 51 Automatic – the Unavoidable

The very first thing I noticed was the fact his particular model (the Unavoidable) was really quite thick at nearly 14mm coupled with a large diameter case at 42mm, makes this a big watch on the wrist – perhaps too big for me. In fact, when I checked my own Swatch models, not one of the three were as large. (in fact one of my Swatches – the Pounds & Squares quartz is only 10mm thick and 41mm diameter).

But, back to this model which is called the Unavoidable (perhaps owing to it’s size?) it has a small seconds @6 and a Date window @3 and a buckle strap, but my overall impression on first seeing it, was all a bit clunky on the wrist.

Now, I have a whole collection of conventional automatic watches, some of which are vintage even, so an automatic watch with winding rotor is nothing new. Some are what you’d call high end, some not so and they are all accurate enough for me (some very accurate indeed). And I doubt any of them are larger than around 12mm case depth.

But importantly – and I allude to the fact this watch has a totally sealed movement – all are repairable should anything go wrong. Now OK, it’s fair to say and certainly in my experience, very few do go wrong and those that might, would probably or possibly rather, be ‘complication’ models, chronographs and the like.

I do note that Sistem 51 Automatic models are mostly simple time keepers with few complications, save the Date, so I assume Swatch are hedging their bets, by minimising the possibility of anything going wrong. In fact, you could be forgiven in assuming these might even be viewed as disposable throwaway watches, which at £200 I believe this one cost, is some throwaway!

Swatch SISTEM51 chunky case – diameter 42mm and case depth of 13.8mm

Would I personally buy one? Well no, being honest probably not this model. The case thickness and the overall diameter doesn’t do it for me.

The SISTEM51 features, such as the reduction of movement parts, theoretically less to go wrong, the re-designed transparent rotor wind, whilst OK, frankly are substantially little different from conventional automatic models.

In other words, personally, I don’t see much of an incentive to have one. And if I wanted a throwaway watch, I’d surely be better with a cheap Quartz model, which could well give better accuracy plus many hundreds of styles, sizes, some amazing complications, looks and features to choose from and so on.

It’s as if they’ve over innovated – updated to transparent rotor – OK but why?, made entirely by robot machine – OK, then sealed it up in a non-opening case? Welded components – so basically it’s un-repairable. Maybe it’s a case of trying to re-invent the wheel? I don’t know, but it doesn’t give me a buzz at all.

However, my young friend likes it, this is his first automatic, so maybe he was unaware autos existed? You never know with the youngsters of today. It could be the mechanical movement fascinated him, as everything else he owns is electronic, modular and solid state (goodness even the latter words are out of date).
Anyway the plus side, for me is, he’s seen some of my watch collection now and is hooked! So much so that he has since bought another automatic watch (not Swatch this time) with an exhibition back, just to wonder at the movement.

So, maybe these folk at Swatch know more about young potential customers than I realised – a little bit of marketing & fashion hype, whilst not, as I say, re-inventing the wheel, managed to convert a young lad brought up on “cell phones and wearables” – to the good old mechanical, wear and forget, battery-less watch.

He’s from birth – in a world of “throwaway” anyway – I mean today if it don’t work – bin it – right?

I’m writing this and thinking – sad! I was brought up in a world where things were made in a way that allowed them to be fixed – in fact when I was younger I used to make transistors – Yeh Yeh Yeh – I know – what on earth is one of those?

Art Deco – enamels

There’s something about Art Deco watches and enamel that just go so well together and as I was digging around in my Wife’s collection I found these.

A trio of Elgin Parisiennes from the ’30’s – perfect!

A nice little trio of Elgin Parisienne models from the 1930’s, each of which is a neat design of watch and coloured hard enamel decoration. Brought out as a marketing idea by Elgin, these were designed by mostly Lucien LeLong and were giver specific names of Haute Couture designers of the day in Paris

Names such as Louisboulonger, Agnes, Jenny and Premet etc. and some whilst featuring wonderful designs of hard coloured enamels also were often cased in 14k Gold filled cases, sometimes with semi-precious gems added within the overall design. And they sold really well in those days and quite affordable too, even then.

These are usually powered by the Elgin 488 mechanical 7 jewel movements with Breguet hairsprings and my Wife has maybe six of the Elgins, plus a few Gruens, Bulova, Fortis, Benrus and if I recall right, Mildus? and a few others whose names escape me entirely, but all of them are decorated with coloured hard enamel.

What always fascinates me is that as watches, they all still work and work rather well and the enamel colours are as bright today, as the day they were made. After all most were made around 90 – yes 90 years ago, rarely serviced and they’re still ticking along – Wow!

In short supply these days and I should take the time collate them properly and manage a Post featuring all of them, which should look pretty good. I hasten to add that she wears each and every one of them, in rotation and although the Pandemic lockdown situation currently has curtailed her social activities somewhat, they still get wrist time.

But once we’re out of this nightmare, then perhaps the ‘Parisiennes’ and others of the day, will be on proper display again.

Anyway, just to brighten up the site, I thought I take a quick snap of this trio, as they were the nearest to hand. I think they look good and so wearable even today, as I find many of the current ladies models look rather dull and lacking any pizzazz, so nice to get them out every so often, just to remind me of past times.

What I love about these watches is that they are NOT specifically “cocktail” watches (I hate the term). They are not festooned with sparkly diamond bits surrounding often over-elaborate mini dials. The Parisiennes are everyday wear watches and very often with some superb enamel work for added colour. And yes, they look great at any so called cocktail. And recently I met a 19 year old who has one – who delights in telling everyone that it’s over 5 times her age! And she doesn’t need a wall socket to charge it either!

Feice Bauhaus – Budget or Bargain?

A name synonymous with the German art of structure, form and function, so persuasive that way back in 1919 to 1933 in Germany, the School of Fine Arts, espoused that form should follow function, without the unnecessary – in other words, a sort of minimalism. But importantly “without stifling design” – and that phrase so important in the world of truly Bauhaus described watches.

True Bauhaus – the Nomos Tangente Automatic Date watch

The Brand that for sometime now has one of the best of Bauhaus tradition is Nomos – specifically the Glashutte Tangente. And it’s well known as a high quality model that manages to command quite a price too. With it’s in-house mechanical Automatic movement, something of a rarity these days, it also manages to be of a nice size at 39mm diameter. Sapphire crystal, neatly cased in high polished steel, I show it here as the standard to which a new contender has to aspire.

Now the Bauhaus philosophy is quite well catered for in the watch business – rivals to Nomos such as – Stowa, Sternglas, Junghans, Junkers and Seagull come to mind and there are others such as Panzera, Nordgreen or Aristo and so on. Most are not as expensive, though the cheaper are often Quartz powered, which for me doesn’t quite gel with the ideal of Bauhaus – I feel the concepts of Form, Function and Structure without the unnecessary, seems to get lost in the static world of electronics – but maybe that’s just me.

Feice FM201 Bauhaus Automatic – more than a copy?

The Bauhaus concept for me is alive in a way that the solid state world just isn’t. Some, for example interpret the Bauhaus movement as a sort of Danish minimalist design, which (I have some myself) and I always end up personally disappointed, because they are so- minimal – and if I’m honest, a little bit barren, dare I say, like furniture – not that Danish furniture is uncomfortable, but I like to see the comfort too, with comfortable surroundings – but again, is that just me?

And this is where the Bauhaus concept is so interesting, by design and in the feelings it gives the wearer. There’s something both comfortable and comforting – and invariably mine end up on my wrist more than most.

I like them, specifically the automatics. Firstly, as they are alive and secondly, you simply wear them and they are part of you. No batteries, no winding and no fiddling around.

So, although I had heard of them, still a bit of a surprise when I came across the FIECE FM201 – in person, as it were. Bauhaus style, Automatic, with understated Date indication and owing to the derisory price I assumed Quartz. I mean – the Fiece is around £150 – and the Nomos near £2000! Now that! is a hell of a difference!

I can understand some of the price differential, as the Fiece sports a Chinese modified movement. Those clever Sea-Gull people at Tianjin in China managing the tricky business of combining mass market methods with increasingly decent movement quality – not easy.

So, as it often happens, it all comes down to Quality v Price.

Of course, much depends on your definition of quality. To some – if it ticks and keeps decent time – then that might be good enough. To others, it’s about “look” and finish and detail and what’s inside and so on – very subjective indeed. And in this particular instance we dare not forget that it’s all about the Bauhaus philosophy too – which is about Form and Function and Structure, and no unnecessary bits – Gets tricky doesn’t it?

My Junkers ‘100yr’ Bauhaus, with Miyota Auto 9132 calibre, 28,800 A/h – a favourite classic for me.

As to Sea-Gull movements, I used to have reservations, in the past, when their assembly procedures were not so good. In those days you might get a good one, or a not so good one, though ironically the movements were very good. I do remember they benefitted from a good clean and service, which instantly elevated them right up there with the Swiss ETA calibres.

However, changed days now and their movements are well respected indeed and have come a long way from the Citizen/Miyota origins – incidentally my own Junkers Bauhaus, shown here features a very good Miyota 9132, 28,800A/h Calibre.

Both Miyota and Sea-Gull have become synonymous with mass availability of excellent automatic movements and can really challenge the ubiquitous Swiss ETA2824-2 automatics.

I applaud them both, as Quality, Quantity and Price are a tricky balance to manage, so no mean feat.

BUT, that’s not the topic for here – suffice to say that “Made in China” doesn’t always mean cheap and cheerful. What it can show is that very decent watches are now widely available to everyone – and that’s a good thing.

But for Fiece, the idea of using the Bauhaus concept and promoting globally and espousing – Form, Function and a certain marketing seriousness, hasn’t hindered them in their mass market approach and by increasing quality is a real bonus. They have carefully followed others with this trend and with some success.

Their Bauhaus ‘homage’ models are attractive enough for me to check them out – and so, I bought the Fiece FM201, and it’s definitely better than expected.

My Feice FM201 Bauhaus 38mm on wrist – Budget or Bargain?

In comparison to the Nomos, the dial text/font clarity and detail is good, as is the Date aperture (though smaller than my Junkers). The hands maybe not quite as delicate, but also good and maybe overall, the dial isn’t quite as – shall I say – ‘fine’, but it’s still very good.

But as always, my observations are subjective. As to the movement – well OK Nomos is certainly highly regarded, but the Fiece FM201 Sea-Gull is pretty decent and with no internal traces of fingers or dust or skin flakes. It also has some evidence of oil (that’s good), so it appears the old Sea-Gull shortcomings of the past, may well be long gone.

Or have I just been lucky? No, I suspect today, they have definitely raised their game.

And as to how it looks on the wrist and for timekeeping – it looks pretty darned good – and it certainly does look ‘Bauhaus’.

So – Budget or bargain?

Well, I would have to say – bargain. It has the Bauhaus look, it’s nice to look at, it works well, suits the wrist and it wasn’t expensive – so what’s not to like!

Of course, there will be detractors who will accuse yet another Brand of producing another “homage” or even a “copy” (and let’s face it, there are many models out there that are close copies of others – right from the top down). Some are near fake category, but that’s taking it too far and such an accusation only valid if their offering was “made to deceive”.

Personally, I like some of those listed here and there are some good Bauhaus styles around. However, with each trying to have that “look”, the result shows that their options are somewhat limited in how they look in reality, so copy accusations are easy to assume, rightly or wrongly.

Me? I’m just a punter, a guy who likes to buy and wear pleasing watches and I like Bauhaus style. So, from my point of view it’s all academic. Selfishly, it simply means I have a greater choice of models and Brands to choose from and in a wide price range too – and it is just that – personal choice.

The Bauhaus concept has no doubt spawned an attractive range of similar styled watches (you either like ’em or you don’t) – and there are bargains to be had.

Addendum –

It should be noted that Tianjin Sea-Gull watches also make their own Bauhaus watch – which is shown here – and it is very well priced too – this is the Automatic D819.612 without date. Nice size at 39mm and 9mm depth with Sapphire crystal – slightly slimmer than the Feice but I like them both.

Latest – However – I do have another Bauhaus, not shown here, which I will feature in another Post quite soon, that for me, has a certain ‘something’ to it, that really appeals – so watch this space!

Sea-Gull Automatic Bauhaus Watch – D819.612

Wrist cuff watches

For those who are not really into watches, but are into wrist cuffs, the featured JewelryWe watches (4 colourways) should fit the brief. Known imaginatively as Watch Cuffs, it really is the price that’s truly amazing – and that’s maybe around £10 each. . . .

The leather strap/cuff of each is a different colour and from a fashion conscious guy, really quite smart – and it tells him the time without referring to his Smart Phone – now isn’t that a novelty!

The watches themselves are pretty basic, quartz and the metal is just, well – metal – but they do tell the time and I have to say, they actually look pretty good. They each weigh just 54 grams, some 1.5 inches diameter and the dials are quite clear and protected with eh – glass. What I’m saying is, these are basic timekeepers, but as with almost any quartz powered movement these days, they are quite accurate enough for day to day wear.

Anyway as wrist watch cuffs or straps, I like them and I like the fact that they are really NOT expensive and are not silly looking (some are) and they are what they are and if you have a damaged wrist – and I sprained mine the other day, they are great as a brace, so a nice coincidence that I spotted them in Amazon.

Actually there are quite a few different styles and Brands there, though these basic versions suit me fine and in fact the more I see them, the more I’m getting in to them. Reminds me of a long time ago, when a lot younger and I actually remember wearing wrist leathers. Of course way back then I also used to ride motor bikes – a fact that was brought to mind the other day, when an old pal of mine turned up on a brand new Husqvarna 400cc motorbike – I mean this guy’s no chicken, but acting like a teenager with two tails and loving it.

Now he didn’t have a wrist cuff on, but before he left, he was sporting a watch cuff – one of the set of 4 I’d just gone and bought!
And then he looked really cool!

Am I a trend setter or what?